Distribution Systems

 

(click here to see a list of all issues for all task forces)

(click here to see a list of all task forces)

COMMENTS


from JBRUCE on 2009-01-12

Distance Learning/Education at Clemson

“A New Paradigm for national leadership”

 

1.       Academic advocate/leader at the University Dean level (tenured) with (minimally) a strong and close working relationship with the Graduate Dean and the Undergraduate Dean (each would carry appointment veto) (leader/advocate should absolutely not be from a technology unit or report to or be housed in a single college)-- with policy formulation authority (DNPH).  Current DL is mostly graduate and/or University Center-related so logic suggests launching any buildup should originate from the graduate sector organizationally with the objective of developing 100% symmetry with undergraduate affairs.

2.       Leader/advocate must have prior demonstrated success in DL (DNPH)

3.       Leader/advocate must have ‘budget-level trust’ of the department chairs (DNPH)

4.       Control of all the tuition revenue (DNPH)

5.       Faculty-centric collegial philosophy of 100% budget transparency and low taxation coupled with compensation incentives and appropriate royalty/recognition structures (DNPH)

6.       Given all the above, we could expect +$10M/yr in FY11 and +$50M/yr by 2015 (DNPH)

 

Bruce Rafert

January 8, 2009

from JFRUGOL on 2009-01-07

Just a note that I've posted for other task forces as well-please remember that we are talking about a subset of graduate education here.  The research sciences, while they supply a large amount of the Gen-Ed and intro teaching through TA positions, and contribute significantly to our standing as a research university, are not suitable for Distance Ed.  Thus we must be careful not to apply a one-size-fits-all solution.

from JBRUCE on 2008-12-22

Anyone on this page should be sure to read the issue concerning asynchronous distance learning.

from SEAN on 2008-12-17

Graduate Education, unlike undergraduate education, occurs in many different formats: asynchronous executive education; on-ground executive education; synchronous distance; online and of course in traditional classrooms. Since graduate populations represent a more diverse demographic than the typical undergraduates, we have to develop distribution mechanisms that meet the needs of the students--taking the education to them in a way that meets their needs. The traditional, on-campus, course-based model is just one of many tools we should have completely developed and accessible.